+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2
FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    Member asklepios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    145

    When to sit Step 1?

    Thanks for the info on here, scottish chap! I find your method corresponds to what I've read on studentdoctor.net, so shall mimic such study techniques and resources.

    I have a question for UK-trained folks, or those who know someone who trained here and then went to the US. At what point in your training did you find the USMLE Step 1 best to tackle? I'm just finishing my pre-clinical studies and thinking of going back to the US for residency. I've looked at some practice material for Step 1 and it looks way more detailed and involved than what I've learned thus far. I know that US students take the exam after the first 2 years.

    I was thinking it might be good to wait until I have more clinical experience, like after my 4th year, or maybe after my 5th year exams (since I'll have to revise all of the years anyhow) and then come back to learn the more detailed pathophysiology and pharmacology, when I can tie them to concrete cases I've actually seen. What do you all think? What worked best for you? I've only talked to one person, an F2 doc who said she wishes she'd taken the exam right after learning all this stuff the first time.

    Thanks!

  2. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    5
    also check this MedArena

  3. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    86
    Quote Originally Posted by asklepios View Post
    Thanks for the info on here, scottish chap! I find your method corresponds to what I've read on studentdoctor.net, so shall mimic such study techniques and resources.

    I have a question for UK-trained folks, or those who know someone who trained here and then went to the US. At what point in your training did you find the USMLE Step 1 best to tackle? I'm just finishing my pre-clinical studies and thinking of going back to the US for residency. I've looked at some practice material for Step 1 and it looks way more detailed and involved than what I've learned thus far. I know that US students take the exam after the first 2 years.

    I was thinking it might be good to wait until I have more clinical experience, like after my 4th year, or maybe after my 5th year exams (since I'll have to revise all of the years anyhow) and then come back to learn the more detailed pathophysiology and pharmacology, when I can tie them to concrete cases I've actually seen. What do you all think? What worked best for you? I've only talked to one person, an F2 doc who said she wishes she'd taken the exam right after learning all this stuff the first time.

    Thanks!
    Having just done Step 1 this summer, I think that you should definately wait until you have done at least some clinical medicine. There is no way that I would have known a lot of the questions (for example side effects of medication) without having seen them demonstrated in practice - although I still wish I'd done more revision!

    Jonathan
    Final Year
    Orthopaedic Science iBSc
    UCL Medical School

  4. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    266
    Quote Originally Posted by jtlc2345 View Post
    Having just done Step 1 this summer, I think that you should definately wait until you have done at least some clinical medicine. There is no way that I would have known a lot of the questions (for example side effects of medication) without having seen them demonstrated in practice - although I still wish I'd done more revision!

    Jonathan
    I'd second this. I took step one a few weeks ago, so I don't yet know the result, but I would say that having a year of clinical behind me helped with lots of questions. 99% of the Qs are 2 step reasoning where they start with a barn door obvious scenario (eg "woman comes into A&E with scalp tenderness and jaw claudication") From this you are meant to get temporal arteritis without even thinking about it. Then the actual question will be something unpleasant like "what would you see if you viewed her blood film?" and you would need to know that she would have a raised ESR and therefore you;d see rouleaux formation blah blah blah

    So the first of the 2 step reasoning process, I think, is easier if you've had a year or two of clinical medicine where those classic presentations are discussed and/or seen, rather than just memorised.

    The downside of waiting until the clinical years is that you are still buried in the basic clinical sciences and your grades for clinical finals or other exams may suffer as a result. There's not an ideal solution but I suspect I would have found step 1 harder if I had done it before clinical med
    George's GEP 2006

  5. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1
    Hi,

    This is Mark. I'm happy to join this forum. I run a resourceful website for USMLE and ABSITE preparations at www.clinicalreview.com.And Im looking forward to be an active member in this forum.

    Thanks,
    Mark

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC2