
Originally Posted by
Haligh Haligh
Thing about the entrance exams is if you are genuinely intelligent you have nothing to worry about.
I applied to Oxford for Medicine and had to sit the BMAT and thought it was ridiculously difficult. I'd never sat an exam so cringe-worthy before. My results came back and I got a 5.8 which I was really impressed with considering how much I hated that exam. Still, my GCSEs weren't good enough for them to give me an interview but they said my BMAT score indicated I was a 'suitable candidate for medicine because I had the aptitude' as they put it.
What the beauty of the BMAT is, is that you can't revise for it. This means to get a good score on it, you genuinely have to be intelligent. The problem is because AAB at A Level is not really a problem for a lot of students to obtain, especially if you revise for months beforehand, universities need something else to discriminate upon before they start dishing out interviews.
This means when you get an interview, it will be much less competitive thanks to these admissions tests.
However, the down side is that the universities might interview candidates who did well on the BMAT/UKCAT but who do not have the necessary people skills, thereby conning you out of your interview.
So it works both ways.
My advice - if you want to do medicine, then don't let stupid aptitude tests put you off. If you don't try, you'll never get in. And even if you don't get in first time, if medicine is what you really want to do, there are other ways to do it.
Bookmarks