+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3
FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 24 of 24
  1. #21
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    42
    Ah, thank you for that. The supplied graph is pretty hard to decipher clearly...
    This is pretty interesting. This year there seem to have been more high scores than the last two. So I guess it was easier?

    (hello, new poster, just found this forum)

  2. #22
    Member Imhotep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    275
    Quote Originally Posted by Bakkur View Post
    Ah, thank you for that. The supplied graph is pretty hard to decipher clearly...
    This is pretty interesting. This year there seem to have been more high scores than the last two. So I guess it was easier?

    (hello, new poster, just found this forum)
    I did a quick analysis of the data from 2006 (from the graph provided on this thread) and the average (mean) was 58. This time round the average was 55.5 - so in actual fact the scores, on average, were lower - it's just that the spread of scores is wider this year (with some people scoring much high and others scoring much lower than the results shown on the 2006 graph).

    Draw from that what inferences you will (but given the approximate nature of the data no estimate of statistical significance can be made).

    Stephen

  3. #23
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    24
    what does a score of 60/75 in section 1 equate to a gamsat score for section 1?

  4. #24
    Senior Member AimsRJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Plymouth
    Posts
    585
    I'm afraid the scoring system isnt known. It is very roughly approximate to % score I believe but there is no way of knowing how to predict scores.
    Oxford GEP fresher Medic 2009

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC2