Go Back   New Media Medicine > Medical Students > Current Medical Students

Newsletter:

Keep up-to-date with the latest medical news stories with the New Media Medicine Newsletter.

Enter your email address to subscribe:

 

Subscribe via RSS

Subscribe to the MedSchoolSelector

Need help choosing a UK medical school? The UK MedSchoolSelector uses patented 1000minds decision support software to help you choose.

Current Medical Students

Forum for Medical Students currently at Medical School

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-01-2008, 09:19 PM   #121 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Muffin2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: leeds
Posts: 713
i don't think it was the NHS who changed it. wasn't it some dude in a big chair in central europe who decided to do it? correct me please if i'm wrong.
__________________
Remember, you can have it all

Leeds 3rd year
Muffin2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2008, 10:06 PM   #122 (permalink)
His Noodly Moderator
 
Spencer Wells's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: RF&UCMS(UCL)
Posts: 3,337
Send a message via MSN to Spencer Wells
The working hours were changed by the EU and their silly laws, in their working time directive.
__________________
Nick - Final year Medical Student with neurophysiology iBSc

Currently: On elective in Rarotonga and probably uncontactable.
The views and opinions that I express are mine alone and not that of UCL or RFUCMS.

Spencer Wells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2008, 11:11 PM   #123 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Dr Noodle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Exeter
Posts: 2,774
There's an opt-out option though. Ireland aren't enforcing it and there's no talk of it happening any time soon.
__________________
Nadia

PCMD- First year
Dr Noodle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2008, 11:13 PM   #124 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Dr Noodle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Exeter
Posts: 2,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeliab_cram View Post
Its the maths that does my head in... you can just see the meeting where someone came up with this stroke of genius:

NHS MD Bloke: So, gentlemen, the EWTD is coming in, and all those house officers are going to have to go from 100 hour weeks to 48 hour weeks over the next few years. thats going to screw us.

Junior Management bloke: Cant we just employ twice as many of them then?

Middle Management bloke: Unfortunately, these doctor people don't grow on trees...

Junior Management bloke: So just train twice as many...

NHS MD bloke: Genius

Tea Lady: but what will you do with all the extra junior docs after two years when they want training jobs?

NHS MD bloke: Shut up, you. Where's the biscuits anyway?
Ha, brilliant
__________________
Nadia

PCMD- First year
Dr Noodle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 01:56 AM   #125 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Varied A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 940
The nub of the problem is that medical students and doctors seem to think they have a god-given right to persue any career path they wish following graduation.

There is no other career in existance where 100% of graduates expect to reach the top of the profession in a relatively smooth way with a well defined timescale. Everybody else (in the public or private sector) has to start at the bottom and work their way up based on ability, experience, availability of jobs and yes, a bit of luck. Doctors are refusing to accept that this is the case, and demand specialist training, access to consultant/GP posts etc for everybody, at the same time as demanding fewer hours when they are juniors. There isn't really any way around the problem except to give the extra work to a profession which isn't going to spit out its dummy because it can't have everything it wants.

There is no doubt that this summer the best candidates weren't selected for the jobs available. But nobody can seriously argue that the government ought to fund jobs for doctors to do whatever the hell they like regardless of what patients actually need and the NHS can afford to pay for.
__________________
John

Mark:- Dr Carter, you seen Dr Weaver?
Carter:- err usually she's everywhere

Last edited by Varied A; 04-01-2008 at 01:59 AM.
Varied A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 04:12 AM   #126 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
yeliab_cram's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Meanwood, Leeds
Posts: 1,521
Anjoo, if you read my original post, my intimation was that 100 hour weeks are no good, but neither are 48 hour weeks. Increasing individual doctor hours is a more cost effective, and sensible solution than training too many doctors. James's response covers the point well.

Varied A, you really love to chew on a raw nerve don't you!

this is the general public perception of the problem, and i'm sorry, but its a load of crap. It has never been easy to progress along the medical careers ladder. There has always been immense competition at each and every step along the way. To suggest otherwise is not only patronising, but quite frankly, its insulting.

The medical community is not complaining about increased competition. Not at all. Competition is an accepted part of the job. We all know that at some point we are likely to have to compromise on either specialty or location. We take that. We also know that we will have to work longer hours than we are contracted for, without protected breaks and often with insufficient senior support. We take that too. The problem is the fact that after F2 a huge number of doctors will essentially be reaching the end of their medical career. Thank you for 5 years of your life at medical school, accumulating shag loads of debt and staffing our wards for 2 years, but we are done with you now, sorry, goodbye.

Show me another profession where the taxpayer spends £250,000 training people to high skill levels, only to employ them for 2 years before making them redundent with no compensation?

It beggars sense and belief. The problem is only exacerbated by the fact that the current system is unable to even select the best doctors to get the limited jobs available.

A system where 8,000 or so excess doctors are hovering around after F2 each year is completely unsustainable.

Of course doctors cant all be employed in "whatever jobs they like" but the government has a responsibility to train only what it needs (at the taxpayers expense) and put those graduates to service in its NHS to serve those taxpayers who paid for their training. Doctors should be able to work jobs with preference, competatively based on a fair assessment of their abilities and skills.

The alternative is we make them all unemployed and they go and work in australia and new zealand. The life is better, the pay is good and its warm. But you tell me why we should fund the training of the entire australasian healthcare system with our taxes!

In my view, this huge problem is self inflicted based on the huge increase in medical school intake in the wake of EWTD. We have enough junior doctors, but nobody, nobody, thought ahead as to what we would do with all those extra bodies after F2. I agree with varied A, that they probably cant all be consultants (definately not all consultants in the specialty they want) but they are hugely expensive to train, so if they cant be consultants, what can they be. Somebody needs to make that decision, and soon, because 8,000 doctors per year are not going to settle for staff grade posts as they currently stand without further training. Especially not when Oz and investment banking are calling.
__________________
Marc

Academic Vascular Medicine & Surgery
Currently: FY1 in Cardiology at the Leeds General Infirmary[/color]

"No matter where you go in life, always keep an eye out for Johnny, the tackling Alzheimer's patient" Dr Cox

www.cuttingedgeleeds.co.uk
Leeds University Medical School's Surgical Society

Last edited by yeliab_cram; 04-01-2008 at 04:17 AM.
yeliab_cram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 02:39 PM   #127 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
DamianUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leamington Spa & Portsmouth
Posts: 1,569
Send a message via MSN to DamianUK
Ok lets cover a few pints that i personally feel are worth respondong to.

Rich Trash...as i said you do talk out of your arse and have again confirmed it.
How many lawyers do you know? My mates who went into Law almost without exception expected to be lawyers after pasing the LPC.
Actually it's almost entirely the opposite of what you said, if you don't get a job after F2 it is potentially the end of your career. Now there are more people than there are jobs (not that we don't need more doctors we are just not funding them) its both competative and time limited. Depending on how long ago you graduated determined what level you could apply for at ST, now if you don;t get a job one year you then reapply possibly at a higher level but with a gap in your CV which makes you less attractive as a candidate and your then trying to get into a stream that may be at capacity...return to go don't collect £200 and try again with an ever decreasing chance of getting a traiing job.
From next year they are taling of removing all FTSTA posts as there will be about 9000 doctors who don't get ST posts which cannot be rectified with FTSTA posts due to cost.
There are more EU applicants for F2 next year than there are posts (so roughly 6500 posts just over 6000 uk applicants and over 6500 other EU applicants... do the math the scale of the problem could be massive) so yes having to take a year out can be career ending...and though people with good CV's didn't get jobs which was due to a rubbish appointments procedure from now on the mount of people will be the main reason for others not getting jobs...plus you may be one of the best in the country at your level but happen to be up against the few candidates better than you..you loose a great doctor because they reduced appointments mean there is no wriggle room to help out a good candidate who gets shafted.

Anjoo, apology accepted, (this i hope you realise is in a softer tone )
A PA who goes on to medicine is not progressing they are re-training in the same way a nurse or radiographer who goes to medical school is.
No i have not worked with any PAs but from what i hear fro the yanks who are here they do a juniors job for more money than a junior but as i said by reducing the training oppertunities for those same juniors and under supervision...this supervision is a requirement of the role as any mistakes are on the supervising doctor in a different way than it would be if a junior did the same thing.
As for point 2 as i have said if the juniors don't do lots of the basic cases they won't be equiped to do the complex ones. I suture a lto in A&E when i am on minors, this is because i want to do surgery and think this is a good skill to practice, most doctors leave the nurse to do it as they are medics and have no interest in doing it once they have a basic level of skill. The basic cases that doctors don't need to see are already covered by nurses with extended roles in places like A&E, in pain teams, specialist nurses for patient infromation and training. A PA adds nothing to existing roles.

I don't think we should give the PAs a break, i think we should make our feelings known (if we are for or against) so that those of us who feel they will de-skill a doctor can raise objections to try and stave them off.
Gov initiatives are destroying the NHS so just because its one of them does not mean we should go along with it silently (there must be a reason we don't train PAs in this country).

Anjoo, debt is not a reason not to go to medical school...my 10's of thousands of £ debt attest to that

As for the hours...i have never had a job where i only did 48 hours a week, in the Royal Navy or in industry. i couldn't do my job there so doubt i will be a beter doctor for having so few hours in medicine.

Dr Noodle...the opt out is only until 2009 i believe, this is what happend for the NHS. Doctors were allowed to reduce to 56 then in 2008 the NHS will make it a 48 hours week as they think it will take a year to get it running for the 2009 deadline.

Varied A...well this nurse does come across as doctor hating, bitter person. She also seems to have little understanding of the reality of medical career progression in the past. When was it easy or smooth to become a consultant? when was it not competative?
How many "career grades" or "trust grades" did you see in the past? This is the problem...they are being removed..so you either get a training post or you get kicked out. Locum jobs are far worse than the old long trust contract.
__________________
FY1 chest medicine
DamianUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 09:20 PM   #128 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Muffin2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: leeds
Posts: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by DamianUK View Post
Ok lets cover a few pints that i personally feel are worth respondong to.

Varied A...well this nurse does come across as doctor hating, bitter person. She also seems to have little understanding of the reality of medical career progression in the past. When was it easy or smooth to become a consultant? when was it not competative?
How many "career grades" or "trust grades" did you see in the past? This is the problem...they are being removed..so you either get a training post or you get kicked out. Locum jobs are far worse than the old long trust contract.
Varied A is a guy called John by the way. But i do agree that he has a bitter hatred towards doctors and medical student. Especially having read other posts he's made. TBH i don't think many nurses understand the reality of life as a doctor. Also once a nurse gets a job thats it, they've got it. With doctors its now they get a job and after 2 years its gone along with their career. And i don't see why doctors should have to move to the other side of the world to get a job. Like someone said earlier, the problems going to have to addressed soon or the number of unemployed doctors is going to rocket.
__________________
Remember, you can have it all

Leeds 3rd year

Last edited by Muffin2; 04-01-2008 at 09:26 PM.
Muffin2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 09:40 PM   #129 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
DamianUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leamington Spa & Portsmouth
Posts: 1,569
Send a message via MSN to DamianUK
AH sorry about any slights based on gender prejudice. I forget the avatar is not the person posting sometimes.

Ah well i have just said on another thread this site is getting me upset so i am going to go and try not to post again till monday and get on with ranking jobs for monday...lets hope i don't end up with a psych one!
__________________
FY1 chest medicine
DamianUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 09:42 PM   #130 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Muffin2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: leeds
Posts: 713
i though Varied A was a woman at first, until one of my friends pointed out it said John at the bottom lol.
__________________
Remember, you can have it all

Leeds 3rd year
Muffin2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +5. The time now is 10:23 AM.


Site Map

Stethoscopes
Health Informatics Blog
Anatomy Videos
UKCAT
MRCP
USMLE Forum
UMAT
GAMSAT
PLAB

Site Credits

Made in New Zealand by New Media Medicine Ltd.

SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0