|
|
|
|
Newsletter:
Keep up-to-date with the latest medical news stories with the New Media Medicine Newsletter.
|
Birmingham Medical School
Discussion forum for medical students and applicants to Birmingham Medical School
07-09-2008, 02:33 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 1,761
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsn
Oxbridge aren't necessarily the best universities - depends on what you're after.
|
But they are... Even if you're after a lively city experience, they're still the best universities - just not in your ideal location.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsn
Birmingham isn't the best medical school in the world. I have no idea what is, but probably Birmingham isn't. However, it is good enough for anyone going to it to be able to become the best possible doctor, as good as if you went to any other medical school.
|
I agree with that, but isn't that the case for most UK medical schools?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsn
Believe me, most of it is up to you. It's not like school where going to a good school means you'll probably get excellent grades. At medical school it's 80% (or whatever) up to your own effort.
|
I hope so! Seems more like a level playing field.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsn
With regards to research, which it is easier to compare across universities than undergraduate teaching, Birmingham is certainly in the top 3 or 4 or 5. We have the third largest research spend in any case.
|
Birmingham is a big city with a big university, so that doesn't surprise me. Research surely has alot to do with funding - more funding = more opportunity for research.
__________________
Leeds : Pending
Nottingham : Pending
Keele : Interviewed 13.11.08 : Pending
BSMS : Unsuccessful
|
|
|
07-09-2008, 02:46 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ladywood, Birmingham/ Norwich
Posts: 895
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tilleyk02
Otherwise what would be the point in putting 7A*'s down on the prospectus?
|
Is it? not online...
The key word being normally - i.e. it is no guarantee what the A* quota will be.
__________________
"Help, help! I need some assistance!"
Small Pox Medical School, University of Rummidge 2007
|
|
|
07-09-2008, 03:04 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ladywood, Birmingham/ Norwich
Posts: 895
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinkerz
But they are... Even if you're after a lively city experience, they're still the best universities - just not in your ideal location.
Birmingham is a big city with a big university, so that doesn't surprise me. Research surely has alot to do with funding - more funding = more opportunity for research.
|
Don't delude yourself about Oxbridge. Just because some people say they're the "best" doesn't mean they are. Do they have the "best" teaching?
If you want that style or teaching yes, if not, then obviously no.
Do they have the best facilities? Obviously not when compared to the new medical schools or even, dare I say, Birmingham.
Do they have the best staff? Probably not, after all clinical staff will gravitate towards the hospitals with the best reputations. Addenbrookes has a very good reputation, but not better than UCH or UBH, so no reason why they should go there in particular.
Is Cambridge prettier than other places? It's ok, but really in many ways I prefer the UEA campus. And Edgbaston isn't bad either.
Does it have a more prestigious past? I'd say definitely not. It has a legacy of conformism, misogyny and being the establishment in personification. It's all very well being 800 years old, but exactly what did they achieve in those first 650 or so years? Thus, I'd say places like Birmingham, Manchester and Sheffield are far more admirable from a historical perspective and have been as influencial.
Is the town exciting? Believe me, living in East Anglia as I do... nobody goes to Cambridge for shopping or a night out if Norwich or London are vaguely within commuting distance.
Is the town interesting in terms of its diversity? err, no.
That's my opinion. You might have a different opinion. It's totally subjective as it depends on what you want. Therefore, there is no universal truth - you can't proclaim Cambridge the best, because even if it is for you, it probably isn't for most other people. Which is why it's so annoying when newspapers call Cambridge the top university. Undeniably it's "a" top university, but not at all necessarily "the" top university.
__________________
"Help, help! I need some assistance!"
Small Pox Medical School, University of Rummidge 2007
|
|
|
07-09-2008, 03:16 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 1,761
|
I don't want to go to either of Oxford or Cambridge.
I am however, of the opinion that they are the best universities in the UK - crazy me!
My ideal university is Leeds - it offers the course I want to do in the format I want to study it. I really like the city. The accommodation is generally good. It's easy on the wallet in comparison with many other cities. Does this mean Leeds is the 'best' university to me? No. I still feel Oxford and Cambridge are better universities, I just don't want to go to them as they are less suited to moi.
__________________
Leeds : Pending
Nottingham : Pending
Keele : Interviewed 13.11.08 : Pending
BSMS : Unsuccessful
Last edited by Kinkerz; 07-09-2008 at 03:23 AM.
|
|
|
07-09-2008, 03:24 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 70
|
I'm not applying to Cambridge either, but I did spend 3 days shadowing a medical student there.
And let me tell you they do have the best teaching there, I still remember everything I was told several months ago. The tutorials are amazing!
So in my opinion Cambridge is the best in the UK 
__________________
Applying for A100 2009
Bristol - Acknowledged
UCL - Acknowledged
UEA - Interview 8/1/2009
Keele - Acknowledged
UKCAT: 590, 580, 700, 880 (average = 687.5)
AS/A2 Predictions: AAAA/AAA
|
|
|
07-09-2008, 04:25 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ladywood, Birmingham/ Norwich
Posts: 895
|
Hrrrm, you spent three days at one medical school... I can only claim to know Birmingham, but we have a fairly mixed curriculum, so I can see in to the pros and cons of both traditional and more modern courses. Basically, it is my opinion that traditional courses are not all they're cracked up to be. Pure PBL might not be very good, but pure lectures with no clinical contact aren't much fun either.
__________________
"Help, help! I need some assistance!"
Small Pox Medical School, University of Rummidge 2007
|
|
|
07-09-2008, 01:17 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 1,761
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsn
Hrrrm, you spent three days at one medical school... I can only claim to know Birmingham, but we have a fairly mixed curriculum, so I can see in to the pros and cons of both traditional and more modern courses. Basically, it is my opinion that traditional courses are not all they're cracked up to be. Pure PBL might not be very good, but pure lectures with no clinical contact aren't much fun either.
|
Has anyone said that pure lectures with no clinical contact is much fun? Truth is, I don't think that's a great way to study medicine. I think it's old fashioned and out dated - it won't teach students to be doctors, it'll only teach students the knowledge.
__________________
Leeds : Pending
Nottingham : Pending
Keele : Interviewed 13.11.08 : Pending
BSMS : Unsuccessful
|
|
|
07-09-2008, 02:00 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ladywood, Birmingham/ Norwich
Posts: 895
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinkerz
it won't teach students to be doctors, it'll only teach students the knowledge.
|
Well, therefore, is it really the best medical course if it doesn't "teach students to be doctors" - that is sort of the point of medical school, as opposed to a BMedSc course.
__________________
"Help, help! I need some assistance!"
Small Pox Medical School, University of Rummidge 2007
|
|
|
07-09-2008, 02:24 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 1,761
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsn
Well, therefore, is it really the best medical course if it doesn't "teach students to be doctors" - that is sort of the point of medical school, as opposed to a BMedSc course.
|
I don't think it is the best medical course. I think there's actually a possibility that it's one of the weaker ones. Although that does depend on how you like to study.
But I wasn't saying that it was the best medical school, I was saying that it's the best university.
George - do you think you remember the things you were told because it was a different experience, and you found it interesting, rather than the brilliance of the teacher?
__________________
Leeds : Pending
Nottingham : Pending
Keele : Interviewed 13.11.08 : Pending
BSMS : Unsuccessful
|
|
|
24-09-2008, 02:19 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brighouse! Near Leeds:)
Posts: 39
|
i always thought it was 5 A*'s, looks like birminghams a no go then 
__________________
AS Levels: Biology A, Psychology A, Chemistry B, Physics B
UKCAT: 642
Applied 09 to: Leeds
Manchester - interview!
Liverpool - interviewed!
HYMS - interview!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +5. The time now is 07:55 AM.
|