Health Issues Around Aberdeen

[tikitiboo]

I know I'm again lowering myself to your level, iBlue, but i think you'll find that I'm correct:

2.03 is around 2 - I didn't disagree with that (maybe you were too busy trying to come back at me to notice)

and yes, 4 is 200% of 2, however, 2 + 200% is 6, which is not what she said.

And my point was not that I don't think you work in this field, but that you were inconsistant so I am disinclined to believe the credibility of your arguement.

Whether of not I believe your occupation is irrelevant, as are the initial numbers quoted, all we have been arguing about is that you are far too arrogant, offensive and rude. Now there are quite a few people agreeing with me (not to mention those I have shown when they've come through, curious about my laughter) so I think I have reason to believe that yes, you have been rude, arrogant and offensive and maybe you should take note of things that actually matter.

'nuff said

[ruridh17]

I think everyone just needs to take a big chill pill here. From what i have seen we have a lot of anally retentive people arguing over the sake of 2%.

This has deeply distrbed me and i am beginning to think about diving into some of the stuff that has caused so much unneeded controversy. Maybe we should all agree that 2% makes minimal effect in the long run. There are still far too many smack heads out there and maybe instead of biting each others balls over a silly silly topic we should just get a lot of baseball bats and hit them sharply over the head and give them a large dose of methadone.

Agreed?? good! Some people call me Babe Ruth...