|
I think we should probably end this discussion :-)
It started off so well! Just for the record, I actually also believe that vaccinations should be compulsory - but I disagreed with the style of the arguments - I don't see why from "the MMR study was wrong" (for whatever reasons) it follows that "vaccines should be compulsory". Also, there is no reason why even if it's compulsory there shouldn't be a few exceptions, if they are clearly laid out. I presume there would have to be exceptions for, for example, immunocompromised individuals, and I don't see why there couldn't be other exceptions, if clear links (e.g. genetic) could be proven. So the key should be to improve vaccine testing, and the procedures for reporting adverse incidents, so these types of reactions can be quickly established...
|